Find Bitly links with missing tags, duplicates and http pages

**Objective:** Audit the unarchived bitlinks in `{group-name}` (default: all groups) created on or after `{created-from}` (default: all time) and list what needs tidying.

**Step 1: Read the links**

Call `bitly-get-bitlink` with `archived` = false, plus `group-name` and `created-date.from` when given. Raise `max-records` until the whole set is returned.

**Step 2: Check each link against these rules**

* **No title** - `title` is empty or equals the long URL.
* **No tags** - `tags` is empty, so the link cannot appear in any campaign report.
* **Duplicate destination** - two or more unarchived links share the same `long-url` (compare ignoring a trailing slash and letter case in the host).
* **Insecure destination** - `long-url` starts with `http://`.
* **Tracking clash** - links sharing a tag whose `long-url` values carry different utm_campaign values.

**Step 3: Rank by traffic**

For links that fail any rule, call `bitly-get-click-month` with `link` and the current `year` and note the clicks, so the user fixes the busy links first.

**Step 4: Report**

One section per rule, each a table of link, title, tags, long-url and clicks this year, sorted by clicks. End with counts per rule and the total number of links checked.

**Rules & Guidelines:**

* Do not call `bitly-add-bitlink` or `bitly-update-bitlink`. This prompt is read-only. Suggest the fix for each finding (a title, a tag, which duplicate to keep) and leave applying it to the user or the `update-bitlink-details` prompt.
* Treat `custom-bitlinks` as a hint only: a branded custom back-half is a reason to keep that duplicate rather than the other.

**Validation:**

* If no links are returned, say so and stop.
* If a rule has no findings, say "none" for that section rather than leaving it out.