Project Management
Asana
Connect your AI to Asana
Project managers, consultants, and team leads orchestrate work across Asana's nested hierarchy of Portfolios, Projects, Sections, and Tasks. AI can synthesize that hierarchy into actionable answers, but only if it respects who can see what and who can change what.
Why it matters
Capabilities that matter most for Asana
01
Nearly 30 ready-made views
Install saved Asana views for overdue tasks, workload and project status from the app store, ready on day one.
02
Work beside time and billing
Join Asana projects and tasks with time, CRM or accounting lists to see delivery next to what it earned.
03
Governed AI for projects
AI tools respect who can see and change what, with per-user and per-team security and approved actions.
Use cases
Example AI Use Cases for Asana
scenario
-
Checking goals in Asana means opening each one, comparing its metric with the target, and working out whether that is good enough for how far into the quarter you are. Goals with no metric, no linked work or a status nobody has touched in weeks are easy to miss.
What popdock provides
--
Name a time period, and optionally a team, and it reads every goal in it with its metric, latest status and the projects and sub-goals that support it. Each goal's progress is set against how much of the period has passed, so a goal at 40 percent with two thirds of the quarter gone is called out as behind. It also lists goals with no metric to measure, no supporting work and no recent status update. Nothing in Asana is changed.
Business outcome
---
Leaders see which goals are slipping while there is still time in the period to act, without reading every goal by hand.
scenario
-
Over time an Asana project collects guests, contractors and people who changed teams, some of them with edit rights. Working out who can see and change a sensitive project means cross-checking members, email addresses and team roles by hand.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and your company's email domain, and it lists every member with their email, access level, edit rights and role on the team. It flags outside email domains with access, guests who can edit, members who are not on the project's team, and access granted in the last 90 days with who granted it, where the audit log is available. You get recommended changes for each person, but nothing is changed: you decide.
Business outcome
---
Access to sensitive projects is reviewed in minutes, so outsiders with edit rights are caught before they become a problem.
scenario
-
A project can say on track in Asana while its overdue tasks pile up. Finding out how a project is really doing means reading the status history, counting overdue and unassigned work, and checking what actually got finished lately.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and it reads the last 60 days of status updates, all open work and the tasks completed in the last two weeks. It gives a verdict of on track, at risk or off track using stated rules, such as more than a quarter of open tasks being overdue, and says plainly when the posted status disagrees with the evidence. The report lists the top risks with their owners and up to three next steps. It only reads; nothing is posted or changed.
Business outcome
---
Project owners get an honest verdict backed by evidence, so a project that is quietly slipping is caught early.
scenario
-
When a task is late, the reason is usually buried in its history: a due date pushed back three times, a hand-off between people, or a question in the comments nobody answered. Scrolling through the activity feed to piece that together takes a long time.
What popdock provides
--
Name the task and it reads its full history of comments, reassignments, section moves and date changes, together with any time logged against it. It turns that into a dated timeline and a diagnosis of why the task is stuck, such as repeated rescheduling or an unanswered question, then suggests one next step and who should take it. It does not guess beyond what the history shows, and it changes nothing.
Business outcome
---
Stuck work gets unstuck faster because the real cause is clear in one read instead of a long scroll.
scenario
-
Time tracked in Asana is stored entry by entry against tasks, with no project attached. Adding up what one person logged in a week, by day and by project, and spotting a missing day or a suspicious 12-hour entry, is slow work.
What popdock provides
--
Name the person and a date range, the last seven days by default, and it totals their logged time by day, by project and by task. Working days with nothing logged are marked, and single entries over 8 hours or days over 10 hours are flagged. Time on tasks it cannot place in a project is shown as unattributed rather than guessed. Entries are never edited, even to fix an obvious mistake; it points them out instead.
Business outcome
---
Timesheets are checked in moments, with gaps and errors surfaced before they reach billing or payroll.
scenario
-
Projects often start life in Asana and never get set up in Sage Intacct, so the time and costs for them have nowhere to go. Finding which active projects are missing means comparing two long lists by eye.
What popdock provides
--
It reads your active Asana projects, optionally for one team, and every project in Sage Intacct, and lists the Asana projects with no Intacct project of the same name. Names that are close but not equal are shown separately for you to decide rather than treated as missing. Once you confirm the list, it creates each project in Intacct with the category you choose and the Asana start and due dates, then reads it back to confirm it exists. It never edits an existing project.
Business outcome
---
Every active project can be costed in Sage Intacct, without duplicates and without retyping project details.
scenario
-
The money for a job lives in Dynamics 365 Business Central and the delivery lives in Asana. Seeing both means pulling budget against usage from one system and open, overdue and unassigned tasks from the other, then working out whether they tell the same story.
What popdock provides
--
Give a job number and it reads the job and its tasks from Business Central, works out cost used against budget, then finds the matching Asana project and its open, overdue and unassigned tasks and latest status. You get one brief with money and delivery side by side and a one-line verdict. It flags clearly when the two disagree, such as cost usage over 90 percent while Asana says on track. Nothing is changed in either system.
Business outcome
---
Project and finance teams share one view of each job, so budget overruns and delivery slips are spotted together.
scenario
-
Before giving someone more work you need to know whether they have room for it. That means adding up their overlapping allocations in Asana, counting their open and overdue tasks, and checking how much time they have actually been logging.
What popdock provides
--
Name the person and how many weeks to look ahead, and it reads their current and future allocations, their open tasks and the time they logged in the last four weeks. Overlapping allocations are added together, and it points out projects where they hold due tasks but no allocation, and allocations with no work behind them. It ends with an assessment of over-allocated, balanced or spare capacity, showing the numbers that decided it. It recommends rebalancing but changes nothing.
Business outcome
---
Managers assign work with real capacity figures, so people are not overloaded and spare time is not wasted.
scenario
-
A salesperson's opportunities and customer balances sit in Dynamics 365 Business Central while their follow-up work sits in Asana. A manager trying to judge their capacity, or spot deals nobody is chasing, has to look in both places and match them up.
What popdock provides
--
Give a salesperson code and it reads their open opportunities and customers with a balance due from Business Central, then finds them in Asana by email and reads their open tasks. You see the pipeline, balances and workload together, with past-due closing dates flagged. It checks whether each opportunity closing in the next 30 days and each of the largest balances has an Asana task, and lists the ones with nothing tracked. It only reads both systems.
Business outcome
---
Deals and balances nobody is following up are found before they slip, with each salesperson's workload in view.
scenario
-
The people doing the work on a project in Asana are not always the people set up as resources on it in Sage Intacct. Anyone missing in Intacct cannot have their time costed to the project, and leavers can stay assigned long after they have gone.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and it reads its members and allocations in Asana and its resources in Sage Intacct, then matches people by name, handling Last, First against First Last. It lists who is on both sides with their access, allocation dates and labor rate, who is in Asana only and so cannot be costed, and who is in Intacct only, calling out anyone inactive or past their end date. It never pairs two different names on a guess, and it changes nothing.
Business outcome
---
Project staffing matches across both systems, so every hour worked can be costed and leavers are cleared out.
scenario
-
When a project's tasks are kept in both Asana and Sage Intacct, they drift: a task finished in one is still open in the other, dates move on one side only, and new tasks are added to just one system. Spotting the differences by hand is tedious.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and it reads its tasks from Asana and from Sage Intacct and matches them by exact name. It reports tasks that disagree on completion or on due dates beyond a tolerance you set, plus tasks that exist on only one side, with counts for each. A task with no date is treated as unset rather than as a mismatch, and a side with no tasks is reported once rather than as a wall of differences. It only reads.
Business outcome
---
Project plans stay in step across both systems, so billing and reporting reflect the work that is really done.
scenario
-
People track time in Asana while the hours that get billed come from Dynamics 365 Business Central timesheets. When the two disagree, hours go unbilled or get billed twice, and checking them means matching people and totals across two systems.
What popdock provides
--
Give a job number and a date range, and it reads the job's timesheet lines in Business Central and the time tracked on the matching Asana project, then compares them person by person. Differences over 10 percent or 2 hours are flagged, people found on only one side are listed, and it notes how many timesheet lines are not yet posted or approved. People are matched by name and never guessed. Nothing is changed in either system.
Business outcome
---
Billable hours are reconciled before invoicing, so time is neither lost nor billed twice.
scenario
-
Time is tracked against tasks in Asana, but the hours that are costed and billed come from Sage Intacct timesheets. Checking that the two agree for a project means totalling each person's time in both systems and lining the names up.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and a date range, the last 30 days by default, and it totals each person's Asana tracked time and their Intacct timesheet hours, including billable hours. You get one row per person with the difference, largest first, plus anyone who appears on only one side. Differences under a quarter of an hour are treated as rounding, not discrepancies, and similar names are never guessed. It only reads both systems.
Business outcome
---
Project hours agree between delivery and finance before they are billed, with the real gaps easy to see.
scenario
-
Overdue invoices sit in Dynamics 365 Business Central, but the people who chase them plan their day in Asana. Turning the overdue list into assigned follow-up tasks by hand is slow, and it is easy to create a second task for an invoice someone is already chasing.
What popdock provides
--
Set how overdue and how large an invoice must be, and it finds the matching posted sales invoices in Business Central and works out each customer's salesperson in Asana by email. Invoices that already have an open task are skipped. You see the full list of tasks it would create, with assignee and amount, and nothing is created until you confirm. Each task carries the customer, invoice, due date and amount, and Business Central is never changed.
Business outcome
---
Every overdue invoice has an owner and a task, with no duplicate chasers and no invoice forgotten.
scenario
-
Opportunities in Dynamics 365 Business Central have closing dates, but salespeople work from their Asana task lists. Deals closing soon, or already past their date, slip when nobody has a task to follow them up.
What popdock provides
--
It finds open Business Central opportunities closing in the next 14 days, or the window you choose, including any already past their date, and matches each salesperson to their Asana user by email. Opportunities that already have an open task are skipped. You see each task it would create, with value, company and closing date, and nothing is created until you confirm. Each task is assigned to the salesperson and due on the closing date. Business Central is never changed.
Business outcome
---
Every deal closing soon has a follow-up on the right person's list, so fewer opportunities slip past their date.
scenario
-
Overdue invoices live in Sage Intacct, while the collections work is planned in Asana. Copying each one into a task with the customer's details is repetitive, and it is easy to duplicate a task someone already has.
What popdock provides
--
Set how many days overdue counts, 30 by default, and name the Asana project, and it finds the overdue Sage Intacct invoices and adds each customer's email and rep. Invoices that already have an open task in the project are skipped. You see the tasks it would create and nothing is created until you confirm. It creates at most 25 per run, largest amounts first, each with the invoice, amount, due date and contact details in its notes. Intacct is never changed.
Business outcome
---
Collections work starts from a complete, duplicate-free task list, so overdue cash is chased sooner.
scenario
-
Writing a weekly status update means looking back over what was finished, what is coming up and what is late, then choosing an honest status. It is a chore, so updates are often late, vague or more optimistic than the work behind them.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and it reads the last update, the tasks completed in the past week and the open work that is overdue or due soon. It drafts a status of on track, at risk or off track with a title and short Done, Next and Risks sections, and shows you the evidence behind the status. Every item under Done is a real completed task. You can post it, edit it or cancel; nothing is posted until you explicitly approve it.
Business outcome
---
Status updates go out on time and match the actual state of the work, without an hour spent writing them.
scenario
-
Before a customer call you want the full picture: what they owe and how late it is from Dynamics 365 Business Central, and what work is in flight for them in Asana. Gathering that means visiting several screens in two systems.
What popdock provides
--
Give a customer number and it reads the customer's balance, credit limit, overdue invoices, open jobs and recent comments from Business Central, then finds the Asana tasks and projects that mention them. The brief puts money and work side by side and highlights overdue invoices with no follow-up task and open jobs with no Asana project. Where a customer name is too short or common to search reliably, it says so and narrows the match. It only reads both systems.
Business outcome
---
Account conversations start fully informed, and overdue invoices nobody is chasing are surfaced first.
scenario
-
The project team in Asana rarely sees the job's budget against usage, which sits in Dynamics 365 Business Central. Keeping them informed means someone copying figures across and judging whether the job is still on track.
What popdock provides
--
Give a job number and it totals the job's cost and price budget against usage in Business Central and reads the matching Asana project's open and overdue tasks and last status. It drafts a status update using clear rules, for example at risk once cost usage passes 80 percent, with the figures and a one-line recommendation. You confirm or edit the draft before it is posted to the Asana project. Business Central is never changed.
Business outcome
---
Delivery teams see the job's financial position where they work, so overspend is addressed before the job closes.
scenario
-
Contract value, actuals and the customer's unpaid invoices are tracked in Sage Intacct, but the team running the project lives in Asana and seldom sees them. Sharing the numbers means copying them over by hand.
What popdock provides
--
Name the project and it reads the contract amount, budgeted billing, actual amount and percent complete from Sage Intacct, plus the customer's overdue invoices. It drafts an Asana status update with one figure per line and proposes a status, for example at risk when actuals pass 90 percent of the contract before the work is 90 percent done. It notes that the invoices belong to the customer, not necessarily the project. You confirm the draft before it is posted, and Intacct is never changed.
Business outcome
---
Project teams see the financial picture in Asana, so cost and collection risks are acted on early.
scenario
-
When someone goes on leave or changes role, their open Asana tasks need a new owner. Reassigning them one at a time is slow, and doing it in bulk risks moving the wrong tasks or changing more than the assignee.
What popdock provides
--
Name who the tasks are moving from and to, and optionally a project, and it lists every open task they hold with its due date and whether it is overdue. You confirm the whole list or leave out the ones that should stay. Only the assignee is changed, never the name, dates or notes, and a handover comment can be added if you ask. You get a result for every task, and it stops after three failures in a row rather than retrying blindly.
Business outcome
---
Handovers happen in one pass with nothing dropped and nothing else about the work disturbed.
scenario
-
Projects are tracked in Asana for delivery and in Sage Intacct for finance, and the two lists drift apart. Projects finished on one side stay open on the other, dates and owners disagree, and some projects never reach one of the systems.
What popdock provides
--
It reads your Asana projects, optionally narrowed by name and team, and your Sage Intacct projects, and matches them by exact name. You get four lists: projects that disagree on completion, start date, end date or owner, with both values side by side, projects only in Asana, projects only in Intacct, and names that matched more than once. Dates are compared as dates, and an unset date is not counted as a mismatch. It only reads both systems.
Business outcome
---
Delivery and finance work from the same project list, so nothing is billed late or left open by mistake.
scenario
-
Jobs in Dynamics 365 Business Central and projects in Asana should line up, but jobs are opened without a project, projects run without a job, and completion and dates disagree. Finding those gaps across two systems is a manual matching exercise.
What popdock provides
--
It reads Business Central jobs with the status you choose, Open by default, and your active Asana projects, and matches them by job number in the project name, or by description. It reports matched pairs that disagree on completion or by more than seven days on dates, jobs with no project, projects with no job, and ambiguous matches it will not guess at. It never matches on customer name alone, and it changes nothing in either system.
Business outcome
---
Every job has a delivery plan and every project has a job, so work is tracked and billed consistently.
scenario
-
Updating a goal in Asana means finding it, entering the new metric value and then writing a status update that explains the change. It is easy to type a wrong number, or record progress that moves backwards without anyone noticing.
What popdock provides
--
Name the goal and the new value, with a note if you have one, and it shows the old value, the new value and the target with progress before and after. A value that moves progress backwards or jumps by more than half the remaining distance is pointed out. It drafts a matching status update using only the reasons you gave. You approve both, only the metric, or cancel, and if the metric update fails the status is not posted.
Business outcome
---
Goal progress is recorded accurately with a clear explanation, so leaders can trust the numbers they see.
scenario
-
Overdue and soon-due tasks build up across projects, and deciding what to do with each one, finish it, push it, hand it off or drop it, gets put off until the list is unmanageable.
What popdock provides
--
Name a person, a project or both, and it lists the open tasks that are overdue or due in the next seven days, with the most overdue first. Each task gets one suggested next move, such as finish, reschedule, reassign, split or close, based on how late it is and how it is set up, with a link to open it. Large lists are summarized by project after the 25 most overdue. It recommends only; nothing in Asana is changed.
Business outcome
---
Overdue work is cleared in one focused session, with a clear decision for every task instead of a growing backlog.
No items found.
Ready to unlock your data?
Start building tools that turn your business systems into AI superpowers
Join forward-thinking companies that are transforming their operations with intelligent, secure AI automation.